📊 Mutual Funds Portfolio Report

Portfolio B - Fixed Income & Multi-Asset Strategy
April 2026 | Data as of March 31, 2026

📋 Executive Summary

Portfolio YTD Return
-1.48%
Benchmark YTD Return
-0.21%
Underperformance
-1.27%
Funds Tracked
8 / 13

Portfolio B underperformed its benchmark by 1.27 percentage points year-to-date. The underperformance was primarily driven by weak returns in technology exposure (Janus Henderson Global Technology: -7.55% YTD) and US equity (VOO: -3.54% YTD). Fixed income positions showed resilience with positive returns in HSBC securitized credit funds.

📈 Fund Performance Summary

# Fund Name ISIN/Ticker Target % YTD Return 1-Month Return Data Date
1 JPM Europe Equity Plus (USD Hedged) LU1046624042 7.1% +1.21% -5.76% 2026-03-31
2 HSBC Global IG Securitized LU1822287964 11.4% +0.73% -0.13% 2026-03-31
3 HSBC Flexible Securitized Credit Bond LU1823213381 7.1% +0.53% -1.15% 2026-03-31
4 PGIM Multi Sector Income IE00BZ4CS792 7.9% -0.40% -1.48% 2026-03-31
5 PIMCO Income IE00B87KCF77 13.6% -0.75% -2.41% 2026-03-31
6 Schroder Global Credit Income LU1751207694 10.0% -0.97% -2.20% 2026-03-31
7 VANGUARD S&P 500 ETF (VOO) VOO 5.0% -3.54% -3.32% 2026-02-04
8 Janus Henderson Global Technology LU0828813369 5.7% -7.55% -7.34% 2026-03-31

🏆 Top 3 Performers (YTD)

1. JPM Europe Equity +1.21%
2. HSBC Global IG +0.73%
3. HSBC Flexible Securitized +0.53%

⚠️ Bottom 3 Performers (YTD)

1. Janus Henderson Tech -7.55%
2. VOO (S&P 500) -3.54%
3. Schroder Global Credit -0.97%

📊 Rebalancing Analysis: Buy & Hold vs Disciplined Rebalancing

Comparing two strategies over Q1 2026: Buy & Hold (no rebalancing) vs Disciplined Rebalancing (2% deviation trigger, 0.5% transaction cost).

📍 Rebalancing Event

Date: January 22, 2026 (Week 3)

Trigger: 2.22% deviation from target allocation

Trades Executed: 3 funds rebalanced

Transaction Cost: $21.55 (0.5% of trade value)

📋 Historical Rebalancing Table

Showing weekly allocation monitoring for PIMCO Income, Schroder Global Credit, and PGIM Multi Sector funds.

Week Date Fund Target % Actual % Deviation Action
0 2026-01-01 All Funds 0.00% HOLD (Initial)
1 2026-01-08 PGIM Multi Sector 25.08% 26.08% +1.00% HOLD
2 2026-01-15 PGIM Multi Sector 25.08% 26.86% +1.78% HOLD
3 2026-01-22 All Funds 0.00% ✓ REBALANCED
4 2026-01-29 PGIM Multi Sector 25.08% 24.24% -0.84% HOLD
8 2026-02-26 PIMCO Income 43.17% 44.06% +0.89% HOLD
11 2026-03-19 Schroder Global Credit 31.75% 30.32% -1.42% HOLD
13 2026-04-02 Schroder Global Credit 31.75% 30.76% -0.98% HOLD

⚖️ Performance Comparison Summary

🏆 Buy & Hold Strategy

Starting Value $100,000.00
Final Value $101,001.33
Total Return +1.00%
Rebalancing Trades 0
Transaction Costs $0.00

🔄 Disciplined Rebalancing

Starting Value $100,000.00
Final Value $100,878.98
Total Return +0.88%
Rebalancing Trades 1
Transaction Costs -$21.55

📊 Winner: Buy & Hold

Value Difference: Buy & Hold outperformed by $122.35

Return Difference: +0.12 percentage points

In Q1 2026, the disciplined rebalancing approach incurred transaction costs without sufficient market volatility to justify the trades. The single rebalancing event on Jan 22 cost $21.55, which eroded the strategy's edge versus the simple buy-and-hold approach.

🔬 Methodology & Data Sources

Data Extraction

Source: Morningstar Global Database

Method: Live Web Scraping - Main Session + Subagent Batch

Extraction Date: April 6, 2026

Data Currency: As of March 31, 2026 (most funds)

Status: 8 of 13 funds successfully extracted; 5 pending retry

Rebalancing Simulation Parameters

Trigger Threshold: ≥2% deviation from target allocation

Transaction Cost: 0.5% per trade

Analysis Period: Q1 2026 (Jan 1 - Apr 6)

Starting Portfolio Value: $100,000